{"id":3867,"date":"2024-12-19T08:41:45","date_gmt":"2024-12-19T12:41:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/?p=3867"},"modified":"2024-12-19T08:43:26","modified_gmt":"2024-12-19T12:43:26","slug":"investigating-skin-cancer-risk-and-sun-safety-practices-among-lgbtq-communities-in-canada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/2024\/12\/19\/investigating-skin-cancer-risk-and-sun-safety-practices-among-lgbtq-communities-in-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Investigating Skin Cancer Risk and Sun Safety Practices Among LGBTQ+ Communities in Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Authors: Fran\u00e7ois Lagac\u00e9, Farhan Mahmood, Santina Conte, Lorena Mija, Amina Moustaquim-Barrette, Jonathan LeBeau, Alyson McKenna, Mahan Maazi, Johnny Hanna, Alexandra Kelly, Raquel Lazarowitz, Elham Rahme, Travis Hrubeniuk, Ellen Sweeney, Ivan Litvinov.<\/p>\n<p>Journal: Current Oncology<\/p>\n<article class=\"bright\">\n<div class=\"html-article-content\">\n<div class=\"highlight-box1\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"html-dynamic\">\n<section>\n<div class=\"art-abstract art-abstract-new in-tab hypothesis_container\">\n<section id=\"html-abstract\" class=\"html-abstract\">\n<div class=\"html-p\">Background: Skin cancer prevention relies on effective sun safety practices. Previous studies have shown that LGBTQ+ individuals exhibit lower sunscreen use and higher tanning bed usage compared to their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts. This study is the first to assess skin cancer risk factors, sun-protective behaviors, and skin cancer concerns among LGBTQ+ individuals across Canada. Methods: A national survey study was conducted between July 2020 and March 2024 and included LGBTQ+ respondents aged \u2265 16 years who had completed the survey. Responses were summarized using frequency counts\/percentages for categorical variables and means\/standard deviations for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to calculate age- and gender-adjusted odds ratios for subgroup analyses. Results: Of the 700 LGBTQ+ participants included (59.3% women; median age 38 years), the majority had a Fitzpatrick skin phototype (FSP) I\u2013III (76.4%). Concerningly, 60% reported &gt;10 lifetime sunburns, 58% reported \u22651 blistering sunburn, 34% had used a tanning bed \u22651 time in their lifetime, and 69% reported having a tan in the last 12 months. Sunscreen was worn regularly by only half of the respondents, and half of the participants agreed or strongly agreed with \u201cI look better and\/or healthier with a tan\u201d. Additional comparisons are presented based on gender, FSP, education, and income. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the need for public health campaigns tailored to the LGBTQ+ community, emphasizing culturally sensitive sun safety education, particularly for LGBTQ+ men, individuals with FSP IV\u2013VI, and those with lower education levels, to help reduce future skin cancer risk.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<div>\ndoi:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/curroncol31120593<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<div id=\"profile-card-drop13547944\" class=\"f-dropdown content profile-card-content open f-open-dropdown\" tabindex=\"-1\" data-dropdown-content=\"\" aria-hidden=\"false\"><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authors: Fran\u00e7ois Lagac\u00e9, Farhan Mahmood, Santina Conte, Lorena Mija, Amina Moustaquim-Barrette, Jonathan LeBeau, Alyson McKenna, Mahan Maazi, Johnny Hanna, Alexandra Kelly, Raquel Lazarowitz, Elham Rahme, Travis Hrubeniuk, Ellen Sweeney, Ivan Litvinov. Journal: Current Oncology Background: Skin cancer prevention relies on effective sun safety practices. Previous studies have shown that LGBTQ+ individuals exhibit lower sunscreen use and higher tanning bed usage compared to their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts. This study is the first to assess skin cancer risk factors, sun-protective behaviors, and skin cancer concerns among LGBTQ+ individuals across Canada. Methods: A national survey study was conducted between July 2020 and March 2024 and included LGBTQ+ respondents aged \u2265 16 years who had completed the survey. Responses were summarized using frequency counts\/percentages for categorical variables and means\/standard deviations for continuous variables. Logistic regression models were used to calculate age- and gender-adjusted odds ratios for subgroup analyses. Results: Of the 700 LGBTQ+ participants included (59.3% women; median age 38 years), the majority had a Fitzpatrick skin phototype (FSP) I\u2013III (76.4%). Concerningly, 60% reported &gt;10 lifetime sunburns, 58% reported \u22651 blistering sunburn, 34% had used a tanning bed \u22651 time in their lifetime, and 69% reported having a tan in the last 12 months. Sunscreen was worn regularly by only half of the respondents, and half of the participants agreed or strongly agreed with \u201cI look better and\/or healthier with a tan\u201d. Additional comparisons are presented based on gender, FSP, education, and income. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the need for public health campaigns tailored to the LGBTQ+ community, emphasizing culturally sensitive sun safety education, particularly for LGBTQ+ men, individuals with FSP IV\u2013VI, and those with lower education levels, to help reduce future skin cancer risk. doi:\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/curroncol31120593 &nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3868,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_eb_attr":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":"","_wpscppro_dont_share_socialmedia":null,"_wpscppro_custom_social_share_image":0,"_facebook_share_type":"default","_twitter_share_type":"default","_linkedin_share_type":"default","_pinterest_share_type":"default","_linkedin_share_type_page":"","_instagram_share_type":"default","_medium_share_type":"","_threads_share_type":"","_selected_social_profile":[],"_wpsp_enable_custom_social_template":false,"_wpsp_social_scheduling":{"enabled":false,"datetime":null,"platforms":[],"status":"template_only","dateOption":"today","timeOption":"now","customDays":"","customHours":"","customDate":"","customTime":"","schedulingType":"absolute"},"_wpsp_active_default_template":true},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-publications"],"acf":[],"modified_by":"pathwp","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3867"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3867\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4283,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3867\/revisions\/4283"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.atlanticpath.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}